Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Track9
"The delay was ultimately ordered by then-acting Assistant Attorney General Loretta King, after consultations with Perelli."

"Perrelli, a prominent private practice attorney, served previously as a counsel to Attorney General Janet Reno in the Clinton administration and was an Obama supporter who raised more than $500,000 for the Democrat candidate in the 2008 elections, the Times reported."

"Rep. Frank R. Wolf, R-Va., told the paper he has been prevented from meeting with and interviewing the frontline lawyers in the case. "Why am I being prevented from meeting with the trial team on this case?" he told the Times. "There are many questions that need to be answered.

http://www.gossipcraze.com/gossip/assistant-attorney-general-loretta-king

5 posted on 12/29/2009 9:44:54 PM PST by Track9 (I'd rather be ruled by the first 100 names in the phonebook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Track9
Thursday, December 10, 2009

From National Review Online

More on Loretta King [Hans A. von Spakovsky]

I ran across some further information today relevant to my article about the testimony of Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. He invoked Rule 11 (which sanctions meritless lawsuits) as one of the supposed reasons for dismissing the New Black Panther voter-intimidation case. Of the career lawyers in this case, there is only one who has been involved in a case in which attorneys’ fees were awarded against the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division (CRD) for filing a meritless case. Loretta King — who, Perez claims, made the dismissal decision — was one of the lawyers on record in Johnson v. Miller, a redistricting case that went all the way to the Supreme Court. Not only did King lose that case, but both the Supreme Court and the federal district court severely criticized the CRD’s handling of the case, finding its practices “disturbing.” The district court found the “considerable influence of ACLU advocacy on the voting rights decisions of the United States Attorney General” to be “an embarrassment.” It was also “surprising that the Department of Justice was so blind to this impropriety, especially in a role as sensitive as that of preserving the fundamental right to vote.” The American taxpayer was forced to pay $587,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs that were awarded to the defendants to compensate them for an unwarranted lawsuit, one in which King and the other Justice Department lawyers “commanded” the state of Georgia, as the Supreme Court noted, to engage in “presumptively unconstitutional race-based districting.”

9 posted on 12/29/2009 9:56:38 PM PST by Track9 (I'd rather be ruled by the first 100 names in the phonebook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson