To: driftdiver
They took a child from a biological parent and awarded custody to a non-biological person. Not so fast!
Typically, the way these couples arrange this is the birth mother is NOT the biological mother. They have the fertilized egg of one partner implanted in the other partner.
43 posted on
12/29/2009 11:03:20 AM PST by
papertyger
(Representation without taxation is tyranny!)
To: papertyger
Typically, the way these couples arrange this is the birth mother is NOT the biological mother. They have the fertilized egg of one partner implanted in the other partner. If that is indeed the case, there are a whole lot of Freepers on this thread who are making a good argument that the child should be with her "Biological" Mother, Ms. Miller.
49 posted on
12/29/2009 11:07:48 AM PST by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: papertyger
Ewwwwwwwwwwww.
For me, that falls into the category of Too Much Information.
50 posted on
12/29/2009 11:08:17 AM PST by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: papertyger
Typically, the way these couples arrange this is the birth mother is NOT the biological mother. They have the fertilized egg of one partner implanted in the other partner.I cant imagine what the Almighy must think of that. No wonder they are cursed. Abomination indeed.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson