I’m not entirely sure, since that’s not spelled out clearly. However, the problem is that if a former two-term President decided to accept a VP slot, he’d have to be prepared to serve as President in case of something happening to his running mate, in which case, his succeeding him would seemingly be a violation of that Constitutional Amendment. If he was able to serve out 8 years as VP without having to step in, then it should be Constitutional. It’s a bit of a grey area.
I thought so.
The reason I ask is that I have my crystal ball out and wonder if there could be a Hillary Clinton/Bill Clinton ticket to challenge Barry 0 in 2012.
I put nothing past any Rat...
See my post 82. The 22nd Am. does not prohibit a two-term president from serving as president, only from being elected president again. The language is pretty clear.
If a two-term president was deemed (through judicial activism) to be ineligible to serve as president again, then, under the 12th Amendment, he would be ineligible to serve as VP.