Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

If the networks think that they are going to survive by going all-Pay TV....they are dead. They cant compete with pay cable now....they will not be able to compete if they challenge pay cable directly


10 posted on 12/28/2009 9:42:12 PM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: UCFRoadWarrior

“If the networks think that they are going to survive by going all-Pay TV....they are dead. They cant compete with pay cable now....they will not be able to compete if they challenge pay cable directly”

Makes sense to me. Broadcast TV will just have to cut costs— there’s plenty of room to do so. Make even crappier reality shows. Outsource to non-union labor.


22 posted on 12/28/2009 10:13:24 PM PST by boocoowell (Nuclear power now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
If the networks think that they are going to survive by going all-Pay TV....they are dead. They cant compete with pay cable now....they will not be able to compete if they challenge pay cable directly

I had worked at a local TV affiliate for many years and the idea of affiliates paying the network (much like cable companies pay their "networks") had been floating around since the early '90's. No one thought it was a viable model, so it was dropped. In other words, this is not a new idea - I just don't think it would work for OTA stations/affiliates.

53 posted on 12/29/2009 7:45:44 AM PST by peteram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson