Posted on 12/27/2009 11:06:16 PM PST by givemELL
"Those who do not believe that Europe’s ruling establishment has engaged in a conspiracy against it own people will also have a hard time explaining the recent decision of the appeals chamber of the Bar Association’s disciplinary council in the Netherlands. On 12 December, it acquitted a Muslim lawyer of contempt of court. The Muslim lawyer, who wears a Muslim head covering during court sessions, refuses to rise when the judge enters the courtroom. He says that his religion maintains that everyone is equal and that, hence, he cannot rise for the judge. Though everyone is equal, however, the same lawyer refuses to shake hands with women. Nevertheless, the Muslim lawyer is getting away with behavior which the ruling establishment would not tolerate from indigenous Dutch lawyers, and, more importantly, which the majority of the Dutch people does not wish to tolerate from newcomers.
Europe’s ruling establishment is currently engaged in policies which go so radically against what ordinary Europeans want that a dangerous rift is growing between the people and those who govern them. If this situation is not remedied, Europe’s governments risk losing their legitimacy in the eyes of the people. One does not need to be a conspiracy theorist to realize that this can only contribute to the potential for a revolutionary explosion of violence and anger somewhere down the road."
(Excerpt) Read more at brusselsjournal.com ...
Gee, that does have a familiar ring to it.
This could very well be said of our leaders!
If some people feel that the murderous cult of Islam is a
religion, they should include MS13, the Manson Family,
La Raza and Planned Parenthood as religions also.
There is a sense of uneasy foreboding about that statement.
It sounds ominously familiar.
Tinfoil hats anyone?
Does this ring a bell also?
“The government took the decision unilaterally, without approval from the Parliament. This is against the law; the Belgian government cannot unilaterally grant a collective amnesty. Only Parliament has the power to do so.
The parties of Van Rompuy’s government coalition shrugged their shoulders. They refused to react against the usurpation of parliamentary powers because they did not want to open a public debate about immigration. Polls indicate that the overwhelming majority of the Belgians opposes the new round of regularizations. “
We are soooo screwoomed ( screwed and doomed)
Yes it does, as does just about every sentence in that article. It's just one of many I've read over the past few years that make me want to apologize to a lot of people I've called crackpots.
Yes it does, as does just about every sentence in that article. It’s just one of many I’ve read over the past few years that make me want to apologize to a lot of people I’ve called crackpots.
********************************
We all live and learn. Even Ben Franklin made it a point to defer more and more as he got older, the more he recognized his own shortcomings.
Have a great day.
Apparently they’ve forgotten that this was precisely how they gave Hitler his rise to power nearly 80 years ago driving a wedge between the middle class majority of the population and their governors.
You can’t continually poke people in the eye and back them up against a wall and not expect them to eventually fight back ferociously.
We're only doomed if we choose to be.
Food tip of the day: an adult human can survive for years on one bottle of water and the small size can of Campbell soup.
We're only doomed if we choose to be.
Food tip of the day: an adult human can survive for years on one bottle of water and the small size can of Campbell soup per day.
Welcome tot the club.
I feel the same way.
The only thing that is making me have second thoughts is the nagging feeling that if they're really out to get you it's not paranoia; like the muslim issue.
But then there's the intellectual part of it.
Don't leaders" megalomaniacally inclined need "happy" victims?
Is the whole concept about chaos?
Who is behind it?
What could possibly be the purpose?
A sullen populace is a dangerous populace, specially if independent of spirit and armed.
This tends to shed some light as to why some judges will not take any action against Obama and having to go head to head with Islamic teachings.
If Obama were to actually have to face any court proceeding he would probably resort to Sharia laws and make Islamic demands that he is not abiding by Christian laws because Islam does not recognize them.
It is not only the US left that has so much affinity for Islam common agendas....the process dates in Europe from at least 1922 when the Communists allied with Islam ...here is a comment from the Gallia blog:
http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2009/12/islam-and-left-make-common-cause.html#links
“Friday, December 25, 2009
Islam and the Left Make Common Cause
Sometimes readers express their confusion over this unlikely and inexplicable new collaboration. We saw it in action during the Gaza conflict. All over Europe, Islam marched arm in arm with Communists, Socialists, Greens, Feminists and homosexuals, protesting (at best), or (at worst) committing acts of extreme violence directed at Israel, Jews, the United States, and the West. All over Europe dhimmi governments and dhimmi media tried to downplay this violence in which police were targeted, innocent bystanders caught up in the melées injured, property destroyed, cars burnt, and so on. How did an extremely fanatical religion find allies in forces that have been fundamentally and vociferously atheistic in the past? An article posted at Sultan Knish provides some clues:
(...) To understand just how far back this goes, consider this defense of Pan-Islamism by the Chairman of the Communist Party of Indonesia in 1922:
“But now one must first understand what the word Pan-Islamism really means. Once, it had a historical significance and meant that Islam must conquer the whole world, sword in hand, and that this must take place under the leadership of the Caliph, and the Caliph must be of Arabian origin. About 400 years after the death of Mohammed the Muslims split into three great states and thus the Holy War lost its significance for the entire Muslim world...
So Pan-Islamism no longer has its original meaning, but now has in practice an entirely different meaning. Today, Pan-Islamism signifies the national liberation struggle, because for the Muslims Islam is everything: not only religion, but also the state, the economy, food, and everything else. And so Pan-Islamism now means the brotherhood of all Muslim peoples, and the liberation struggle not only of the Arab but also of the Indian, the Javanese and all the oppressed Muslim peoples. This brotherhood means the practical liberation struggle not only against Dutch but also against English, French and Italian capitalism, therefore against world capitalism as a whole. That is what Pan-Islamism now means in Indonesia among the oppressed colonial peoples, according to their secret propaganda – the liberation struggle against the different imperialist powers of the world.
This is a new task for us. Just as we want to support the national struggle, we also want to support the liberation struggle of the very combative, very active 250 million Muslims living under the imperialist powers. Therefore I ask once again: Should we support Pan-Islamism, in this sense?”
The speech in question may date back to 1922 but its sentiments are very modern and commonplace among liberals in the West today. Their view is that Islamism is a people’s liberation struggle against Western imperialism and capitalism because it serves as a common bridge between Islam and the Left today in 2009, just as it did then in 1922.
This reinterpretation of Islamism as an expression of economic and political discontent today tends to be described under labels such as resistance to Globalization or to corrupt Western “puppet regimes”, but it is in fact a carbon copy of the Soviet approach to Pan-Islamism. This ideological approach enables the left to co-opt Islam in the struggle against Western hegemony. Meanwhile Islamists have long since learned to put forward economic and political grievances in order to make common cause with the left.”
Of course, Hitler had studied Islam before he wrote Mein Kampf, and, it is today the most popular book in the ME and is titled “Jihadi” by Adolf Hitler. Two of Hitlers ss divisions had Islamic generals, one was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who was instrumental with Carter in returning Khomeini to Iran in the seventies with such fateful results. The Baath parties of Iraq and Syria are pure IslamNazi parties modelled after the German party. In this country the Reps have a strong relationship with the Sunni Wahabbists via Saudi Arabia, and the Dems with both, and recently, Obamas’ appeasement of the Iranian Shiite govt has been non-productive and dangerous, as well. The flirtation of the left has been institutionalized in the EU rather thoroughly, and demographically, the death of European civilization is assured unless there is a bloody rejection of that institutionalization. Mere rejection of minarets in Switzerland is not enough. Europeans need 6-8 children per family to compete and provide their own labor force. In the US, abortions over the last 20 years have more than equalled the invasion of illegal aliens guaranteed by both parties administrations of late. It was all so unnecessary to rational thinkers.
Those two are particularly troubling to me. I've never been able to shake the feeling that Obama is a sock puppet. Even during the presidential campaign when everybody was swooning over his 'articulateness' and keen intellect, without his handlers and choreographers he seemed to me like nothing but a boogerflinging nitwit. How he was hyped so successfully as America's salvation when virtually all of his mentors and associations were people who unabashedly despise this country's bedrock culture, traditions and founding principles? How come NOBODY seems to want to pursue the reason his school records are hidden from us in a way that is unprecedented? Even the smarmy way many Republicans behaved toward him seemed creepy to me. It was as if GOP had become the political equivalent of prison bitches. When he was elected, it seemed different to me as well. More than the natural disappointment and bitterness one feels when one loses, particularly in these hyper-partisan times, I had an eerie, unshakable feeling that a trap had been sprung. Now, the suspicion and contempt I've long felt for the Democrat party, I now feel for the entire American political class. Judges, politicians, journalists, educators...they all now seem like 'pod people' from some sci-fi movie.
Regarding the 'amnesty for illegal aliens' issue that was the main topic of that article, again I'm bewildered at the WILLFUL disregard from our federal government, even during the eight years that the Republican party had complete control of the reins of power. Americans were screaming for something to be done about it since the late 80's, yet they either ignored it or told us to go to hell regardless of the damage that was being done to our society...Why? Now we have the muslim snake trying to coil itself around us, and even seeing the situation our European cousins are now in, there's the same willful disregard from our federal government...again why? What have they to gain? Even when one factors in ideology, egotism and greed, the three primal impulses in politics (I long ago quit believing there was any measurable quantity of altruism), what's happening these days seems to be driven by much more. Frankly it's a bit spooky.
The article makes complete sense to me. I think that is something we’ve been saying around here for years.
The Netherlands will replace their voters with a more compliant population, Muslim! lol
Look no further than George Soros. The leftist politicians of Europe and the US have the same ultimate goal in mind, one-world leftist government. The muslims are being used as a diversion; the object being the suspension of individual freedoms leading to the implementation of draconian rules for control of the population.
Otherwise it all makes no sense. The anti-terrorist rules and laws are not about the muslim population; the are about the likes of you and me - to cower us; to subject us to the heel of the oppressors boot.
If the Western powers were really in an anti-terror war would they allow the almost unlimited migration of muslims to the west? No! Would they show the the unprecedented favoritism shown to Islam? No! Would the provide billions in humanitary relief? No! Islamacists are the dupes in this global scharade and the Western common man the victims.
The leftists want to destroy capitalism. The islamacists want to destroy or subjugate Western civilisation; therefore you have the cosy alliance that has grown stronger since 1947. The left figures that once they reach the position of global supremacy the will no longer need islam and they will quit supporting it and if necessary deal it a heavy blow from which recovery would be impossible. It is an alliance of convenience for the left.
To me this is as plain as the nose on my face and has been for a long time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.