Posted on 12/27/2009 12:44:08 PM PST by Sub-Driver
Patently unqualified hack... I like it. Send her back to doing something she's more qualified for, like delivering newspapers.
haha!
I was striving for more toad-like. Alas.
Napolitano has a habit of arguing that DHS is a first responder outfit. Its mission is to deal with “man-caused-disasters” afer they occur. It appears she really believes it.
So Obama who is responsible???????
Just ‘wafted’ around, huh?
I wonder how the Kenyan’s round of golf was today.
“This bull dyke is sooo ugly she’d make Quasimodo go LIMP!!”
I think it’s a reflection of the real ugly on the inside.
Yep. This is now a new version of terrorism. Don’t have to bomb anything, just toy with the passengers (non-whites, muslims doing the toying) and if the passengers are too encumbered by PC, good, and if not encumbered by PC, good, because they will threaten to sue. It’s a win-win.
A little more “Green” might help. ;)
I seem to recall one of the reasons for Homeland Security was to shield the department from procedures and requirements imposed by collective bargaining agreements. There was a huge fight about it in the house. Bush and company wanted the DHS to have the flexibility to hire, fire, and assign duties to personnel based on merit and competence instead of seniority, and connections.
I read recently that Obama and company are trying to rewrite that portion of the legislation to allow DHS employees to be represented by unions. (SEIU) Sorry, I can’t find the source at the moment.
If you think security and air travel is bad now wait until the TSA is represented by Andy Stern and his associates.
And then there was the agent in AZ, I think, who was alerted to the number of Muslim men wanting to take flight training, but not taking off or landing, just how to navigate and control the airliner in the air. He tried many times to interest Washington in the report but never could.
Now we have a man with no baggage, a one-way ticket paid for with cash and no passport being allowed to fly into an American city.
I am very doubtful we will be able to defend against our enemies much longer unless some serious changes are made. Despite what those in charge think inconveniencing millions of hard-working, tax-paying American citizens with needless security measures has not made us any safer. All that and the ONLY thing that saved us from a disaster was a faulty detonation of device successfully carried on board an international flight and concealed until minutes before landing.
I don't think we can plan on that kind of luck to save us too many times in the future.
She was your Governor? Please tell me she’s fallen on her head or something since that time...
This sounds exactly like Napolitano's claims that everything worked as it should have. To admit the obvious facts would reveal the incompetence...no matter that the lie is so obvious a 3 year old could see through it.
And I agree with you, although there are some ideologically driven elements it's the structure of bureaucracy that's built for mediocrity and failure. Therefore the only rational approach to government is smaller is always better because it allows less room for bureaucracy.
So, where does the US military and its attendant bureaucracies fit into this picture? Perhaps the winning of wars are the occasional filling of certain objectives?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.