Nullification of HCR sought in several States

Examiner.com ^ | Dec 28, 2009 | by Terry Hurlbut

[grey_whiskers]

When the first Muzzie nuke hits CONUS...

Janet should be the first hung for treason.

Cheers!

[SweetCaroline]

*

[VOA]

bump for publicity

[nomad]

Then the states should withhold all fed taxes and place them into some state controlled escrow until the feds act according to the Constitution.

[Stultis]

It's sickening that we must act against our own government, but utterly necessary. Collectively and individually, fling every monkey wrench possible into every cog.

Fact is, even if patriots stood aside, implementation of this nightmare, should it pass, is already bound to be a civilizational cluster-you-know-what of monumental proportions.

What is it? A hundred and fifty new agencies and offices to be set up either immediately or within a couple years? Whole new layers of bureaucracy, and multiple levels of coordination with state agencies, all based on often ambiguous legislation written in backrooms on the fly, much of it never even submitted to committee review, some of it never even printed up before votes were held?

Were it not going to destroy millions of jobs, tens of millions of lives, and cost trillions of dollars, all not only for no benefit, but rather for degradation in health services, it would almost be funny to watch Obama's Keystone Kops try to pull this off.

[liberalism is suicide]

Reform: We’re being *chloro*formed.

[nina0113]

If a state nullifies the “Obamacare”, do they also get to exempt residents from the higher taxes?

Maybe this is what we need to overturn automatic withholding, the law/regulation I would most like to see repealed. If everyone had to actually write that check to the government every payday, there wouldn't be a Tea Party, there'd be a Tea Riot.

[guitarplayer1953]

How can they make health care manditory across the nation under the commerce clause when it is illegal to buy health insurance across state lines?

[Jim Robinson]

They can’t. It would be unconstitutional:

http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/lm0049.cfm