Perkins Coie didn’t represent Obama in any new eligibility cases during that three month period of time. If I’m wrong, show me where and I’ll retract. I’ve already documented the only two cases in which Perkins Coie did represent Obama.
For the third time, the point in mentioning those other expenses is to point out that Obama for America is still operating and still has expenses, including legal expenses. So the fact that OFA continues to pay Perkins Coie for “Legal Services” as general counsel is to be expected.
No amount of evidence will convince you otherwise. So I don’t know why you began this conversation. You’ve not addressed (or not comprehended) the key points I’ve offered.
Yes, let’s do stop the merry-go-round.
Giving the benefit of the doubt, I am going to assume that your use of the word “new” in your response was not to be dependent on the what the meaning of ‘is’ is. Because, as you well know, any “new” cases would be handled by DOJ. Perkins Coie is responsible only for a few suits filed before the Inauguration.
That said, I would refer you to the docket for Hollister v. Soetoro. You will note that during the months of August/September 2009 there was extensive activity, including Perkins Coie’s filing of a 6,532 word Appelllees Brief, and receipt of Hollister’s 32 page Appellants Brief and Appendix, together with various motions, letters, etc.
I look forward to your retraction.