“a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii.” And noting a birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper.... Neither document was provided for the court, because neither document exist”
They have been posted on the internet.
Only if you make the misrepresentation that a computer-generated COLB is the same as an actual “birth certificate,” as you are doing. You know the two things are not the same and yet you engage in a fraudulent misrepresentation. What is your reward for that?
So all you need is a laptop and an internet connection so you can show the judge the “evidence”?
Yes judge, I just need to find the website where I posted that document your honor, hold on it is here somewhere...
They have been posted on the internet.
A posting on the internet is NOT a document -- except in the bizarro world of Obamabots.
The photoshopped image of the COLB that suddenly appeared in 2008 on the internet has been debunked as a forgery by at least two forensic document specialists. No physical colb has ever been provided for verification.
The birth announcement is a virtually useless piece of documentation as to providing any ‘proof’ of birthplace—it could easily have been posted by the word of one relative (Obama’s maternal grandmother) as Hawaii allowed.
And we have plenty of reason to believe the Dunham family knew there was clear advantage to attempting to document this baby as having ‘american born’’citizenship— since the mother, Ann, was too young at the time of delivery to convey parental citizenship upon her newborn (as is automatic when the mother is of legal age for the designated amount of time) Grandma Dunham stepped in.
Ann wasn’t.
admitted forgeries