Guess The Missing Word In NY Times Report On Attempted Plane Bombing

NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

[GOP Poet]

Amish?

[2harddrive]

There are THREE missing words! BLACK ISLAMIC TERRORIST.

[AmericanInTokyo]

OK, we are getting the first (albeit blurry) pictures of the sonofabitch and the incident:

From UK Telegraph just now.

[drubyfive]

describe a spiral staircase without using your hands

helical flight of steps

[ProtectOurFreedom]

MIA...
J-word,
I-word, AND
M-word

[kinghorse]

Richard Reid singlehandedly caused a billion humans to take off their shoes in deference to his act. What religion is big on taking off shoes as a sign of respect? Hmmm.

Now all Americans will get to do a little more at the airport in order to catch a flight. Get ready to be required to take off your shoes and socks, roll up your pants to the knees and kneel at the metal detector. Somehow they are going to figure out how to require TSA to put a crescent moon on metal detectors.

[pabianice]

Full discussion of the religion involved in The Boston Globe

[JrsyJack]

The suspect was being treated at a hospital for burns severe beatings, broken limbs and head injuries he suffered while igniting the device...

How it should have read

[supremedoctrine]

This whole concept of “man-caused disaster” deserves a little more analysis than it’s gotten: it sounds exactly like an insurance term, ironically, joined to and NOT directly opposed to “Act of God”. YET, a terrorist act IS in a sense an Act of God, in that it’s being perpetrated ON BEHALF OF Allula Akbar, or Mohammed, and as such, your “insurance” probably won’t pay for the damages.
Of course, the way they want us to take it is that “man-caused disaster” is merely, and once again, a Law Enforcement issue, and not to be considered on any level an “Act of War”(or its other corollary, an “Act of God”) Even Orwell would be stupified at how far adrift we’ve allowed ourselves to get with our language.
We’re asked to accept conceptualizations that even the feebleminded could see through.

[supremedoctrine]

This whole concept of “man-caused disaster” deserves a little more analysis than it’s gotten: it sounds exactly like an insurance term, ironically, joined to and NOT directly opposed to “Act of God”. YET, a terrorist act IS in a sense an Act of God, in that it’s being perpetrated ON BEHALF OF Allula Akbar, or Mohammed, and as such, your “insurance” probably won’t pay for the damages.
Of course, the way they want us to take it is that “man-caused disaster” is merely, and once again, a Law Enforcement issue, and not to be considered on any level an “Act of War”(or its other corollary, an “Act of God”) Even Orwell would be stupified at how far adrift we’ve allowed ourselves to get with our language.
We’re asked to accept conceptualizations that even the feebleminded could see through.

[governsleastgovernsbest]

OK, you’re permanently cleared through TSA security ;-)

[SuperLuminal]

Muslim Moslem...

[the invisib1e hand]

Guess The Missing Word In NY Times Report On Attempted Plane Bombing

Stupid? I never hear the media talk about how ever-loving stupid these goat-herders are.

Talk about the gang that couldn't shoot straight. Nothing like a little comedy to spice up a good tragedy.