I usually don't pay any attention to these side arguments and false identity accusations. But in this case it's too obvious to ignore. Gumlegs has nailed it. You ARE Ted "medved" Holden. Either that or you're a friend, wife, daughter whose account Holden uses, or you're a big time Holden groupie. But I think you ARE Ted.
It isn't just the linking to an otherwise obscure Holden page in the present instance.
Even just glancing at your posting history, there are numerous circumstantial similarities, e.g. common interest in archery, same view of neanderthals. And then there's far more telling stuff like this post of yours (wendy1946) and this page at Ted Holden's site.
In that case you reproduce, not only without referencing, but without even linking the Holden page, a very long quote from the obscure Velikovskian Gunnar Heinsohn, EXACTLY as it appears on the Holden page.
EXCEPT THAT, tellingly, you (wendy1946) leave off the last few sentences, starting with Heinsohn's quote of Velikovsky. That would have been too much of a give away, if you were medved, and trying to hide your identity. But maybe you (wendy1946) are not medved (Ted Holden) and just happened to stumble on this obscure Holden page, and cut and pasted, and just coincidentally left off the last few sentences of a long quote you otherwise copied in full, and just never mention that this is all from Holden's site, and was a personal communication to Holden from Heinsohn.
EXCEPT THAT, you (wendy1946) happen to know that Heinsohn is at the "Univ. of Bremen," something which Holden never mentions on his page.
No. You're Ted Holden alright.
I'm the oblivious type. Always the last to pick up on the juicy behind the scenes stuff.
And I thought compromising someone else’s screen name was verboten on FR.
And you evos are still here. Imagine that.
Kind of hard to complain about someone violating the forum rules and demanding that they get banned when you’re violating them as well.
Shouldn’t you also be banned in that case?
Just askin’.....