Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Disinformation. The hospitals repeat that they oppose the use of federal funds to support abortion. If the Times were an honest newspaper instead of an agenda driven rag, that would be the headline/lead paragraph.


11 posted on 12/25/2009 8:50:35 PM PST by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Godwin1

Exactly.
wtf?
The title of the article contradicts the contents.
Our local Catholic hospital has said in no uncertain terms that it will in no way yield to performing abortions.

The caveat in all this of course, is the power that the future secretary of Health and Human services will have in defining “qualified health plans” and the ability to accredit hospitals or deny accredidtaion based on adherence to the rules outlined.

The “compromise” / “working with” statements simply mean that they are waiting and listening and probably engaed in some talks as to how they might be able to stay accredited if they decide to draw a firm line against abortion.

We must pray for our nation and our children, born and unborn.
I do not think the Catholic Hospitals will waiver on this issue. If accredidation becomes tenuous, then more lawsuits on this assinine bill will follow.


19 posted on 12/25/2009 11:39:35 PM PST by schwingdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson