[BP2]

Of course, the libs will tell you that al Qaeda’s just a “local phenomena” in Afghanistan and all our efforts should be focused there.

Everytime I hear a news report that has a phrase like, “The man, who has not been publicly identified by officials...” — as had initially been reported with this failed Terrorist — it seems codeword for “Radical Islamic Terrorist.”

Just like THIS alleged "Radical Islamic Terrorist" dirtbag killer was unnamed in the first few hours of Nov. 5 with the Fort Hood "shootings."

[Brytani]

There has been some question if Hassan was at the White House given he took part in the transition for the administration.

I should have put a sarcasm tag up....

[piasa]

It's true you can tell more from what the press avoids reporting than what it does report. In addition to omitting tell tale info such as names in terrorism cases the media is also in the habit of leaving out party identification when a lib gets arrested, investigated or indicted. You know it's a Democrat if party affiliation is not mentioned. You know with almost 100% certainty it's an islamofascist when the name isn't released.

The Fort Hood case was a classic case of the government sticking tis head in the ground in the hopes that if it can't identify the problem there is no problem. All three of this year's big terror stories involve Yemen.

We've got a huge problem building in Yemen with more Iranian involvement and I don't think predator airstrikes are going to solve it any more than Clinton's cruise missiles stopped al Qaeda in Afghanistan.