Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Eye

You are twisting yourself into a knot trying to prove your fringe outlook.
Keep trying, it is sort of amusing.


264 posted on 12/25/2009 8:45:39 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: SoCalPol
Sorta makes you wonder, under what circumstances would this president have been awakened?

Apparently the initial assumption now is not that an action like this one spoke but an isolated incident not worthy of any CIC action.

266 posted on 12/25/2009 8:48:45 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]

To: SoCalPol

Based on the article, the attacker was subdued in the air and taken into custody on the ground. He claimed to be part of a world wide terror organization but investigators could not verify those claims.

So based on this information you think that the president needs to immediately know that they don’t really know anything?

No confirmed terrorist attack, no confirmed ties to AQ, no significant injury or damage to the plane, crew or passengers....so what was there that was critical to tell the president that MAYBE the VP could have handled?


270 posted on 12/25/2009 8:54:41 PM PST by Eagle Eye (3%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson