Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samtheman

The carrier is under the authority of the nation its in.


23 posted on 12/25/2009 3:07:49 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

Then maybe it shouldn’t fly to that nation anymore.


24 posted on 12/25/2009 3:11:39 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek
The carrier is under the authority of the nation its in.
The more I think of this, the more angry I get.

Let's suppose, just for a moment, that we had an actual pro-American as President of the United States and that he issued an Executive Order through the FAA that any carrier caught knowingly bringing in no-fly passengers to the United States lose their landing rights in US International Airports for one year for the first offence, 5 years for the 2nd offence and 10 years for the 3rd offence.

Let's see what happens then.

Of course, we have a pro-Terrorist President of the United States who will never issue such an order, but I'm just saying... on a certain level the Netherlands can't dictate to us who we accept on planes bound for our airports... not if we don't let them.

38 posted on 12/25/2009 3:39:48 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson