Yes, I've seen your home page. There's links to several web sites and several people named: Beverly Nuckols, Dr. Robert Spitzer, Dianne N. Irving, Mary Meehan, Rebecca Messall. Why not simply say to me, "Gee Dan, look in the White Pages and you'll see my real name."
How’s that Ron Paul thingy working out for you these days?
This post proves that you're running on empty. Instead of responding to the points I made, you chose to resort to base character smears and lies, just like your hero, GW Bush.
As I said, I've never been a supporter of Bush or Paul because I believe they're both lying politicians.
If the website were full of lies, then why didn't Bush sue in civil court for libel? His lawyers sent cease and desist letters threatening legal action. Why didn't Bush follow up? Why did he seek to have the FEC step in?
I suspect you already know the answer as well as I do, but you don't want to admit it.
Yes, one legal challenge to the use of his name *was,* indeed, the FEC complaint. In our conversation, the other poster had pointed out why the website might not have been considered libel under the law.
However, it is wrong, whether legally considered libel or slander or not, to appropriate a man’s name to use as a weapon against him.
Unfortunately, I don’t believe Ron Paul is lying when he justifies terrorists attacks, as he has for 3 years. Asking you how his views work out for you is not “base character smears and lies.”