Posted on 12/24/2009 10:28:07 AM PST by Salman
Such a large piece of linen was very costly. The pictures I've seen show repairs, and repairing was like an art during the Medieval times and before. For such a piece of cloth to last even several hundred years makes it remarkable.
If the fabric is not 2000 years old, it is not the Shroud, whatever the image shows. They just need to competently test the fabric from an area that has not been repaired. It is very strange that they have not done this.
If the fabric tests out to be from the time of Christ, that would make the cloth a fascinating relic even without the image, since preserving cloth for so long a period of time. It would also add a lot of credit to whether the image is authentic and supernaturally produced.
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks a fool in paradise. I got here a little late; I was basically offline from FR for a few days, and your ping got buried. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Neat post.
Some straw on the “less likely to be real” side of the scale, in that:
(1) it survived (common argument being the mere survival of the SOT is a miracle) and
(2) it is consistent with the argument that the fabric of the SOT was not in use at the time in question.
But, just some weight and not conclusive.
I agree — in matters of religion (in particular, denominational arguments among Christians), there is increasingly little room for logic on any side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.