[Lonely Bull]

I think that people who agree with the text are positive atheists who have a chip on their shoulder regarding religion. Really, what more could be inferred?

I agree with a good deal of your post, including this part.

As for the distinction between negative and positive atheism, one of my critiques of that Heinlein quotation is the use of "religionist." At least out of context, it can easily be taken to mean only those who adhere to what is conventionally considered a "religion." My experiences with Positive Atheists have shown me some remarkably tenacious (though annoying) examples of faith.

(My biggest reaction to the quotation is my skepticism that any intelligent person engaging with our world actually lives in the "cold light of reason" anyway as opposed to the "warmth" of faith, but I'll probably post more about this reaction later.)

[GL of Sector 2814]

As for the distinction between negative and positive atheism, one of my critiques of that Heinlein quotation is the use of "religionist." At least out of context, it can easily be taken to mean only those who adhere to what is conventionally considered a "religion." My experiences with Positive Atheists have shown me some remarkably tenacious (though annoying) examples of faith.

Another Heinlein quote is relevant here:

"There is no conclusive evidence of life after death. But there is no evidence of any sort against it. Soon enough you will know. So why fret about it?"

I think he would have agreed with you about Positive Atheists.