To: Def Conservative
Leader Harry Reid cited the case of a young disabled boy in Nevada who Reid said will now have health coverage Not for five years. Lying SOB.
3 posted on
12/24/2009 5:58:32 AM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
(Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
To: gov_bean_ counter
What Harry is not telling you is that disabled boy is on the list of the death panels.
73 posted on
12/24/2009 7:00:25 AM PST by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: gov_bean_ counter; ExTexasRedhead; LucyT; Yaelle; Arizona Carolyn; Atom Smasher; freekitty; ...
I'm glad you put the words "will now have health coverage" in boldface. The biggest lie in this whole debate is the one that started the whole thing: the false premise that if one doesn't have coverage, one gets no access to medical care or the equally false presumption that if one has coverage, one gets access to the care he needs. Only a dummy can't figure out that you can indeed get medical services without an insurance policy if you make arrangements to pay your own way or if you get yourself into some government sponsored program. Inversely, you can have a policy and still not have access to the care you need because your insurer refuses to pay for it. So, Dummycrats, the bottom line is that insurance does not equate to adequate medical care, and the inequality can work both ways.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson