Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: myknowledge

Given Microsoft’s previous actions in such lawsuits, they will most likely buy out the plaintiff.


11 posted on 12/24/2009 3:40:35 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pnh102

Damn near all of MS’s early “innovations” were the theft of some other companies work, Gates didn’t have a contract with the actual owner of DOS when he signed the contract with IBM ,, DR-DOS is the most recognizable theft however at around the time .. MS-EXCEL was a direct clone of “visiCALC” ,, of course at the time it was such a simple program and an obvious concept the IBMer that invented it didn’t patent it. I don’t remember whose defrag program MS stole and then paid off the owner after they broke him.

I have no problem ignoring MS’s claims to ownership.


18 posted on 12/24/2009 6:16:41 AM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102
Given Microsoft’s previous actions in such lawsuits, they will most likely buy out the plaintiff.

They will pay $290 million and get nothing. Why would i4i sell?

They have now changed the code so as to be in compliance. Why would they buy?

27 posted on 12/24/2009 11:33:23 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson