[brent13a]

Because you imply (in post 83) that an epitaph written by men, not part of G-d's Law, nor spoken or taught by Jesus is a requirement to be a "follower in Christ".

I've simply asked you why you believe that a rule, created by men not G-d, supercedes G-d's Law and Jesus' teaching that He is the Way and believing in Him is Salvation.

Whoops, my bad, there's that word supercedes.....that would be that pesky little thing I don't subscribe too: supersessionism.

[Petronski]

Because you imply (in post 83) that an epitaph written by men, not part of G-d's Law, nor spoken or taught by Jesus is a requirement to be a "follower in Christ".

No, I asked about the Nicene Creed. Any implication you drew from that is your own.

I've simply asked you why you believe that a rule, created by men not G-d, supercedes G-d's Law and Jesus' teaching that He is the Way and believing in Him is Salvation.

Why would I answer your question after you refused mine?

[Petronski]

Epitaph?

LOL

That’s even dumber than post 81, paragraph 2.