Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 Red States Now Questioning Nelson Deal
New York Times ^ | December 23, 2009 | Katharine Q. Seeleye

Posted on 12/23/2009 12:13:54 PM PST by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-153 next last
To: GraceG
Born in Nebraska, feel free to sue my home state over this.

Nothing wrong with Nebraska or its people. Its it's scumbag politicians that put it in danger...

61 posted on 12/23/2009 12:52:03 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bert
You harketh correctly, sir!
62 posted on 12/23/2009 12:52:37 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Republican Senators didn’t bring home any pork at all because they were not part of the negotiations with Democratic leaders.

Yeah but, at least they got to watch it on C-SPAN, right? I mean, sure, I was stuck at work every day but, Mr. Obama said this would all happen out in the open, on C-SPAN. That's just the sort of change we voted for.
</sarcasm>

63 posted on 12/23/2009 12:52:46 PM PST by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Yes. But it sure makes the Dems look slimy to the average Joe. But the Constitution will eventually prevail over the mandates.


64 posted on 12/23/2009 12:54:32 PM PST by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456
Just curious... why do they only need 51 votes NOW? i thought the nuclear option was for “budget” reasons....

As I understand it, the 60 votes are needed to end debate. Once debate is ended, a simple majority can pass the bill.

65 posted on 12/23/2009 12:55:13 PM PST by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Even if the constitutionality of this provision in the bill it would only address Nelson’s bribe. The remainder of the bill would remain intact.

That's correct. It's not about the unlimited scope of federal power. It's about the unequal distribution of that unlimited power.

66 posted on 12/23/2009 12:55:45 PM PST by Huck (The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“The bill would be considered null and void, providing his quid pro quo were held illegal.”

The whole bill or just that provision?


67 posted on 12/23/2009 12:56:24 PM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Well, I wrote this to Ben Nelson at his web site messaging page (as Pogo said, "If only I could write, I'd write to my Senator, if only he could read"):

Dear Senator Nelson:

Here's a quote from the press: "Nelson said on the floor that there is still plenty of time for other states to get the same deal that Nebraska is getting before they’re hit with the Medicaid costs."

Don't you see that if all 50 states were to do this --- whoosh! --- there goes the bill's whole rationale?

This bill was supposed to be "defecit neutral."

The whole prospect of of "saving money" and "avoiding bankruptcy" was based on off-loading costs onto states and individuals: "unfunded state mandates" in expanding Medicaid, and a legal compulsory mandate for everybody to purchase private insurance.

Without "externalizing" the costs in this manner, the whole deal is clearly far more expensive than any of us can afford.

You need to vote NO.

Or get back to me on how we're all going to save money, because you're going to pay my insurance, and I'm going to pay yours.

68 posted on 12/23/2009 12:57:06 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Point of clarification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Nelson has said that he would vote for the bill only if...

We know his word means nothing!

69 posted on 12/23/2009 12:57:41 PM PST by lonestar (Obama and his czars have turned Bush's "mess" into a national crisis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I really think it is time for a few states to tender plans to secede. If they were contiguous, all the better. Other than Florida York, I think the entire south would leave. Anyone upset by this could return north whence they came.


70 posted on 12/23/2009 12:57:51 PM PST by Lowcountry (RIP: Peterdanbrokaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
They should also be questioning the other Nelson deal. Nelson of Florida.

Yes, this bill is crammed full of similar "special deals" for some factions. Did the unions get an exemption on the "cadillac health plans" yet? This bill still has to go through conference.

71 posted on 12/23/2009 12:59:16 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Joe Wilson said "You lie!" in a room full of 500 politicians. Was he talking to only one person?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Breaking news today from the Texas AG's Office:

“The Nebraska Compromise, which permanently exempts Nebraska from paying Medicaid costs that Texas and all other 49 states must pay, may violate the United States Constitution, as well as other provisions of federal law,” Abbott said. “In light of this unprecedented and highly questionable backroom deal, Texas will join South Carolina and other states in an effort to thoroughly review the constitutionality and legality of the Nebraska Compromise.”

Abbott added that his office would look at challenging the exemption, if it remains a part of the final bill. He also called the exemption a “backroom deal.”

“Because it disadvantages Texas taxpayers, the Texas Attorney General’s Office will explore all available avenues to challenge and overturn this legally problematic provision. Our democratic system of government depends upon transparency and openness,” he said. “This backroom deal goes too far and must be challenged because Texas deserves better.”

Source

72 posted on 12/23/2009 12:59:18 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

You know if this bill stands Nebraska will have a lot of “residents” all of the sudden.

I know military members can “live” there while not having a home there.


73 posted on 12/23/2009 1:02:05 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Restating the ‘in a sane world’ comment, the whole bill.

My reasoning is that he said he couldn’t support the whole bill without this.

When he said that, he set the parameters.

The is a futile exercise, I admit.


74 posted on 12/23/2009 1:02:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Good news. HC bill will not cover illegal aliens. Bad news. 20-35 million will become citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ExTxMarine
And you missed Debra Medina on the GOP side ; )
75 posted on 12/23/2009 1:03:21 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

The Dims are not that smart to have planned this all out. I doubt Nelson was willing to look like a corrupt, ignorant boob in front of the entire nation. The only thing bigger than a Dim Senator’s appetite for pork is his/her ego. Now he is the poster child for Democrat corruption and if we are lucky, his name will become a noun!


76 posted on 12/23/2009 1:04:02 PM PST by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

The first civil war started in part with the Missouri Compromise and subsequent “Compromises”. Just goes to show that we should never compromise on our principles....

Maybe the “Nebraska Compromise” will be the first bit on tinder in the tinder box of CW2?


77 posted on 12/23/2009 1:06:00 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Next Senate round - after conference — will require 60 votes to secure cloture.


78 posted on 12/23/2009 1:06:27 PM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Bob Schrum says “brokering legislation” is the American way. Well let’s show him the American way of VOTING OUT CROOKS who don’t represent their constituents in the US SENATE!!


79 posted on 12/23/2009 1:06:28 PM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Let’s try to find ways around all these scams the Rats have put in there. So if they allow unions to be exempt from the cadilac tax...how about big companies that have great health plans start a no fee workers union. This union will be paid from the company for the sole purpose to buy health insurance and negotiate for the workers the best health insurance based on what the company is willing to provide.

That is the sole purpose of this union. Heck I may appoint myself the Head Union Thug and sell this solution to companies wanting to save money on taxes. All the company has to do is tell employees if they don’t vote for proposed health care union then they will be forced to pass the cadilac tax onto each individual.

Of course my fee will be small compared to the taxes that would otherwise need to be paid.


80 posted on 12/23/2009 1:06:44 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson