Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hennie pennie
Everybody seems to claim that on ALL of the "certifigate" birth certificate messagethreads.

Haven't you read any of them, there must be hundreds upon hundreds of postings stating just that.

Not everybody. There's plenty of us on this forum who believe that the definition of NBC that requires both parents to be U.S. citizens is pure bunk, a fictional definition created by birthers to be a standard of eligibility that Obama could not possibly meet.

Furthermore, there's this:

That's the Chief Justice of the highest court in the land swearing in a man whose foreign father is a matter of public record to the office of the presidency.

And then there's the 62 (and counting) dismissed or denied eligibility cases. Pay particular attention to Ankeny v. Daniels as this is the only court case so far that has offered an opinion on Obama's eligibility as it pertains to the 2 citizen parent requirement. Not surprisingly, the court didn't buy the birther definition.

Lots of people posting something over and over again doesn't make it fact.

91 posted on 12/23/2009 9:45:23 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Drew68
Why is BHO spending over a million dollars to NOT release his long form birth certificate?

Personally, I don't believe he was born in Hawaii. Of course I can't PROVE it, but it seems that BHO can't prove it, either.

And what's will his wife Michelle being quoted on the campaign as telling his supporters NOT to worry, that they weren't going to let a "little thing like an adoption" keep BNO from becoming prez??

100 posted on 12/23/2009 10:34:41 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68; All; Candor7; appalachian_dweller
Don't complain to me if you believe that you can trust the Chief Justice of the United States during such dangerous times as these.

That's YOUR problem.

The Ba-ROCK STAR GROUPIES are out in spades, today!!! LOL

105 posted on 12/23/2009 11:03:07 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Drew68; hennie pennie
"Not everybody. There's plenty of us on this forum who
believe that the definition of NBC that requires both
parents to be U.S. citizens is pure bunk, a fictional
definition created by birthers to be a standard of
eligibility that Obama could not possibly meet."

If it is pure bunk why is it written in the constitution?
Center column 3rd paragraph down:

Source:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=071/llcg071.db&recNum=2
>! you have to turn to page 1291 !>

According to the the principal framer (John Armor Bingham )of the 14th amendment, particularly
the Citizenship and the Citizenship Clause (Defining who was a citizen of the United States) and by Mr. Obama’s
own admission he is not a Natural Born citizen.

“Bingham states: I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill],
which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the
jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language
of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen… . . –
John Bingham in the United States House on March 9, 1866”

152 posted on 12/24/2009 3:04:55 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson