Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Does sound unconstitutional to me. Would like to hear from a Constitutional lawyer on this one.

Can the Senate even set rules for the House to follow? I think not.


4 posted on 12/22/2009 8:59:38 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: K-oneTexas

I’m an attorney; I don’t specialize in Constitutional Law but I’ve got a good understanding. See Comment 6. It’s not valid.


7 posted on 12/22/2009 9:02:36 PM PST by henkster (Copenhagen: A really long Monty Python skit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

The House has the power of the purse, if they wish they can defund the entire thing and there is not a single thing that can be done about it.

This language is funny as it attempts to use the Senate as a arbiter of the Constitution, and it was never meant to be so, because one legislative body passes a law, a future one may then repeal it no matter the language in the original law.


8 posted on 12/22/2009 9:04:15 PM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson