You wish. Let's take the Civil War as an example. That was as significant a rebellion as you are likely to see. And yet, some even believe that the national power wanted a pretext for armed conflict. Even if they didn't, let's look at the outcome. Setting aside the awful loss of life, what were the political consequences? Did the conflict enlarge or diminish the power of the states? Did it enlarge or diminish the power of the national government?
For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.
Sun Tzu
Armed resistance would be a boon for the national power. The outcome is woefully easy to predict. The armed resistors are put down. They are demonized as racist, atavistic, extremists. The national power uses the conflict as a pretext for grabbing even more power. The ideals of the resistors become discredited among the common people, and success becomes that much more difficult to attain.
The points you continue to hawk tend to the fatalistic; that is, NOTHING can be done to defeat tyranny in the long run. Given Man’s nature that may be true, but if the cycle can be broken, Americans probably stand as good a chance as anyone of breaking it. We shall see. Your attitude on the matter certainly doesn’t lend any support to the notion. Could your time and talents be better spent doing something else?