Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385

Hmm, interesting thoughts in that, though I’m not certain that Tea Party protestors and American Victory advocates are exactly at odds to begin with, most Conservatives and moderates want both wars to be one, the anti Victory forces are generally far more leftist than even Lincoln Chaffey.

Unless “foreign policiy views” is meant to be some sort of codewords?


3 posted on 12/22/2009 5:42:00 PM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: padre35

Meh...the pseudo attack...of the moderate moderates...

“At the moment, neoconservative domestic policy arguments are out of favor, but there is scarce evidence that their foreign policy arguments are unpopular among Republicans and conservatives. When even some of the “antiwar” Republicans on Afghanistan vote for imposing sanctions on Iran and wish to launch a war against Iran, it would appear that neoconservatism is not nearly as politically weak as we would like it to be.”

Ronnie was against Attacks on the Taliban after 9/11...

He’s our cindy sheehan..


4 posted on 12/22/2009 6:10:59 PM PST by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: padre35

There are only two options, win the war or lose it. Being anti Iraq/Afghanistan war can either mean tail-between-legs defeatism, or get it over with by winning decisively. I don’t believe playing for a tie is an option any sane human believes in (hence Obama is not sane).


6 posted on 12/22/2009 6:14:50 PM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson