To: Tublecane
What part of the COTUS empowers the federal government to decide what I amy eat, drink, or smoke?
Another commerce clause rationalization, no doubt.
4 posted on
12/22/2009 1:53:15 PM PST by
swain_forkbeard
(Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
To: swain_forkbeard
There ought to be a law against plastic bags!
To: swain_forkbeard
“Another commerce clause rationalization, no doubt.”
No diggity! Either that or the “necessary and proper” clause.
To: swain_forkbeard
Another commerce clause rationalization, no doubt. It started with the ability to tax. The Fed required a tax stamp, then refused to issue tax stamps. You can thank the racist, hypocritical anti-drug crusader Anslinger for that.
To: swain_forkbeard
What part of the COTUS empowers the federal government to decide what I amy eat, drink, or smoke? Another commerce clause rationalization, no doubt.It's not un-Constitutional when we do it. /s
60 posted on
12/22/2009 4:05:29 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Tar & feathers! Pitchforks and torches! ... Get some while supplies last.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson