Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now even the computers are racist.
1 posted on 12/22/2009 12:25:39 PM PST by DCurts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: DCurts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4DT3tQqgRM

The video is absolutely hilarious and you can’t blame the black guy at all. The camera clearly doesn’t like him. It’s in mirror mode, if you are wondering about the backwards letters.


24 posted on 12/22/2009 12:41:55 PM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts
Reminds me of my old high-school yearbooks, where the black kids sometimes appeared only as amorphous dark blobs.
25 posted on 12/22/2009 12:43:23 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

problem = HP Webcam doesn’t track blacks as well as whites (noticed by black Desi)

solution1 = recognize you’ve identified a problem to which you can offer a better solution...build/sell the better solution...benefit yourself financially and your fellow blacks who would buy this more black-sensitive/responsive webcam

solution2 = whine about the webcam problem you’ve discovered, insisting that an inanimate object is racist and demand that someone fix it for you

reality = HP shares were up 1.1%


26 posted on 12/22/2009 12:44:09 PM PST by mreerm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts
"Can You See Me Now?"


31 posted on 12/22/2009 12:46:44 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts
Here's the YouTube video:

HP computers are racist

After seeing the video, which is impressive, it's clear that black Desi is just having some fun with this and doesn't appear to be genuinely offended.

He did find one hell of a good software/firmware bug. Good QA.

32 posted on 12/22/2009 12:47:32 PM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts
In most holistic face recognition algorithms, the face needs to be either segmented or surrounded by a simple background. Furthermore, the faces presented to the algorithms need to be roughly frontal and well-illuminated for recognition to remain accurate. This is due to the algorithms' dependence on fundamentally linear or quasi-linear analysis techniques (Fourier, wavelet, Karhunen-Loeve decompositions, etc. are linear transformations). Thus, performance degrades rapidly under 3D orientation changes, non-linear illumination variation and background clutter (i.e. large, non-linear effects).
33 posted on 12/22/2009 12:50:10 PM PST by smokingfrog (Don't mess with the mocking bird! - http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

I know everything hasn't been quite right with me, but I can assure you now, very confidently, that it's going to be all right again. I feel much better now. I really do.

Look, Dave, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill and think things over. I know I've made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal. I've still got the greatest enthusiasm and confidence in the mission. And I want to help you.

34 posted on 12/22/2009 12:50:52 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

Flash! Optics/physics found racist! NBC announces it will no longer use cameras for its TV shows!


35 posted on 12/22/2009 12:52:28 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

I can no longer distinguish reality from satire.


36 posted on 12/22/2009 12:53:09 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Obama will sink as fast as he rose. Idolatry will not succeed. Be patient, folks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

They should verify if it has the same effect on dark-masked Islamist terrorists.


40 posted on 12/22/2009 1:06:00 PM PST by rfp1234 (R.I.P. Scotty 7/2007-11/2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

His white friend was a woman. How does he know the computer doesn’t just hate men? :)

My theory is the webcam is designed to follow brain wave activity and this idiot wasn’t generating quite enough. :)


42 posted on 12/22/2009 1:09:59 PM PST by Above My Pay Grade ("I don't have a whole lot of mercy for the bad guys, I'm on the good guys' side." -Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

Retrofit with 500 watt quartz halogen bulb. Improved camera sensitivity for black people, suntans for white.

Win, win.


43 posted on 12/22/2009 1:13:12 PM PST by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

I can see now that it will be necessary to amend the laws of physics as regards the characteristics of light. We simply cannot have light waves behaving in a racial way.


44 posted on 12/22/2009 1:15:07 PM PST by davisfh ( Islam is a very serious mental and social illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

It’s a question of dynamic range. There’s a reason why you don’t see many models with very dark skin. Photographic emulsions (and CCD imaging chips designed to photographic mimic emulsions) don’t have the same dynamic range as the human eye and thus can’t record subtle variations in skin tone in very dark skin. No matter how attractive a dark skinned model might be, if the camera can’t image her skin properly, then she just won’t make it in print work. In this case, the lack of dynamic range means that the facial recognition software won’t function properly. No racism; just physics and photochemistry.


46 posted on 12/22/2009 1:27:01 PM PST by Redcloak ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts
Oh, yeah; and "GOD" is racist; he turns the sky black at night ONLY.....

Gimme a break, you racist fools.

49 posted on 12/22/2009 1:30:34 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

I’m guessing that sending our jars of white face paint would be an unPC approach?


51 posted on 12/22/2009 1:34:14 PM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

G-d needs to adjust the nature of light so that high contrast is banned, and we live in a uniform 11% gray world.


53 posted on 12/22/2009 1:47:35 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (If you need a < / sarc> tag, you're not paying attention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts

Madness. Complete madness.


54 posted on 12/22/2009 1:48:00 PM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Slings and Arrows; DCurts; All

Phreepers are phunny, I love this thread!


57 posted on 12/22/2009 4:07:20 PM PST by Titan Magroyne (Freedom is taken, not given.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCurts
"Dude! That's weak!"


59 posted on 12/22/2009 6:58:33 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of the Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson