Posted on 12/22/2009 10:22:04 AM PST by StACase
Copenhagen's dud status shows that perverse disaster psychology is alive and well no disaster meant no action. That's unlikely to change until the climate change story has its Pearl Harbor moment, an event so catastrophic, so violent, that it instantly mobilizes entire countries. By then, of course, it may be too late.
(Excerpt) Read more at theglobeandmail.com ...
I think we had the “Pearl Harbor” moment - the Anglia email release finally woke up critics and put them on a “war footing”. Only in this case we acted before we lost a significant part of our fleet. It was the “kamikaze alarmists” who ended up in disarray.
It’s not over, either, but we’re paying attention now, aren’t we.
I was just thinking that the other day when I heard a representative from a South Pacific island say something about suing industrial countries to save his land.
Yeah, and the BS they were trying to peddle us here in FL back five years ago in 2004. That this once in a life time battering of Charley, Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne, would now be the norm thanks to Global Warming. The funny thing is you actually had folks around here buying that crap.
which climate crisis does he want to avoid?
the coming ice age that in the early ‘70s they were sure was going to happen... or the meltdown they’re now sure will happen.
it’s not about global warming...it’s about global governance.
if it were truely about global warming, there would be no such thing as a carbon credit.
a carbon credit does NOTHING to reduce carbon output...in fact, all the effort surrounding carbon credits INCREASES carbon output
“which climate crisis does he want to avoid?”
The problem, of course, is that proponents keep trying to generate a “Pearl Harbor” moment and keep falling flat on their faces. Their assertions don’t carry a lot of credibility any more.
It was called Katrina. And Al Gore used as the centerpiece of his Oscar-winning film the thesis that the number of hurricanes in subsequent years would shatter previous records. Of course the opposite happened, proving that future such "Pearl Harbor events" will also fail to prop up the AGW theory. Because random events prove nothing, especially when the preponderance of evidence is overwhelmingly stacked against this fraud.
9-11 was the Pearl Harbor moment that Cheney wanted so the New World Order could accelerate their plans for us. Nobody realized that 9-11 was a planned event at the time-though many had their suspicions with the WTC implosions.
Thank God that the emails and the excellent work done by many (Singer, Monckton, email whistle blower, etc.), along with God’s marvelous design of the universe, have made a climate Pearl Harbor a distant concern and of no relevance. The deceit has been revealed. However, the evil NWO types could still attempt the disasters written about in Crichton’s prescient “State of Fear.” It’s just that now we know the truth ahead of time. The real man-made disasters to avoid are being hatched daily by the Dems in D.C.
B I N G O !
Isn't it interesting that the lefties haven't proposed that we regulate fossil fuels at the source. They don't want to limit how much coal we dig out of the ground or how much oil or gas we pump from the wells. Why do you suppose that is?
Could it possibly have to do with the fact that if something isn't produced, it can't be taxed?
Al Gore and Michael Moore hugging and kissing on stage.
That’s disgusting!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.