Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12; ConservativeStatement

I disagree: BOTH those peepers would have been ridiculed and estranged from their community for invading the privacy of the subject of their complaint.

That said, what kind of man struts around his home in the altogether for several HOURS?

I maintain that HE is NOT the problem, but there are several issues here that are not addressed by this OLD story. Posting the SAME story 3 or more months later without ANY updates is IDIOTIC!!

Or is our FRiend just a moron? OLD news is not NEWS, it’s OLD!


47 posted on 12/20/2009 10:31:25 PM PST by Don W (I keep some people's numbers in my phone so I know not to answer when they call)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Don W
There were no peepers, one woman called police after seeing a man exposing himself to her when she was in her car, while he was at the front window, the other woman and her child were walking on a path close to the house, two hours later, (about 8:40am) when the same man opened his screen door and stood there exposing himself as they walked by.

One victim called the police who drove by to see if they noticed anything and two hours later the second victim called police, peepers are charged, in this case there were no peepers, only a flasher that was convicted of exposing himself.

Those are full length windows, he also opened a door to expose himself to the mother and child (for them he did a door and a window), is what the jury found.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

50 posted on 12/21/2009 8:10:08 AM PST by ansel12 (Traitor Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative warrior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson