And you don't call ignoring the will of the majority of Americans, circumventing or completely going against the constitution and ergo betraying the oath they each took, forcing Americans to purchase health insurance they they may or may not need and may or may not be able to afford, and taking over the USA in a mini-commie-coup being "aggressive" on their part???
Geez. What ELSE do you need them to do to prove that they mean us harm?
> and taking over the USA in a mini-commie-coup being “aggressive” on their part???
Geez. What ELSE do you need them to do to prove that they mean us harm?<
certainly there is a take over and circumvention of our rights and the constitution. But until they take up arms against us we can not.
It is at the point (and we are nearing it) when they force heir will upon us through the use of violence that we can take up arms against them in defense of our rights.
Prior to that I do not think that we are constitutionally correct in doing it. Let them be the first to use force is what I am saying.
Let it turn into a Thiamin square, where we stand against a tank and get world coverage. Only at that point can we get the sympathy and they become the total aggressor in EVERYONE’s eyes.
Otherwise we just become branded as “right wing extremists” and they can punish us as they want. And they will bring in troops and we will have that much of a harder time winning.