Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steelyourfaith; SunkenCiv
Wikipedia is gigantically useful for any sort of topic for which no controversy could possibly exist. For anything involving any sort of controversy no matter how slight, wiki is utterly worthless.


10 posted on 12/19/2009 10:32:59 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: wendy1946

Yep. Well said.


11 posted on 12/19/2009 10:37:23 AM PST by steelyourfaith (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: wendy1946
Acolytes whose writing conformed to Connolley’s global warming views, in contrast, were rewarded with Wikipedia's blessings. In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement. The Medieval Warm Period disappeared, as did criticism of the global warming orthodoxy.
This may explain a couple of very weird things I've seen when editing Wiki-pages (I've only done a few of those). In the edit window there is comment code that doesn't show up in the browser, and some of the comments I've seen have been really angry and stupid.
15 posted on 12/19/2009 3:38:08 PM PST by SunkenCiv (My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson