Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CutePuppy

Returning to Glass-Steagall would prohibit banks from doing EXACTLY what they did and that is

1) commoditize mortgages
2) bundle mortgages
3) play loose and fancy free with the designations of credit risk on those bundled mortgages

All three of those steps were primary enablers to the current crisis. Glass-Steagall would return banks to a position where they are risk takers on a small scale instead of being risk takers on a grand scale. Stability of the banks is on of the corner stones of a sound financial system.


13 posted on 12/19/2009 1:34:33 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

Countrywide (and others) did all three, before and after G-S repeal.

“The names may have changed, but the game stays the same.”


15 posted on 12/19/2009 1:46:43 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

Well, there is nothing wrong with Banks selling mortgages in bundles, the problem lays in the taxpayer being forced to subsidize those banks via the FDIC.

To me, they can be traditional banks, or investment banks, they cannot and should not be both if they are on the FDIC plan.

Imho a bank that wishes to engage in those activities should remove themselves from the FDIC pool, and either create their own insurance pool or self insure.

Glass Steagel revived is not the way to go, something completely new is needed but we will never see that day.


34 posted on 12/19/2009 12:28:49 PM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson