AND how in h3ll does this EVER equate to the childrape perpetrated by that creep0 pedophile Polanski.
That is an outrageous comparison.
Lots of folks testified against him and the judge found the guy GUILTY. Yet, like many liberals, conservatives will buy some perv's defense that it's his right to get naked in his own home, more on this later.
The fine, fine Williamson fellow just loves to assert his property rights and this includes his right not to wear clothes in his castle if he so chooses. Conservatives, like many liberals, not bothering to use common sense, jump to his defense. Also like the idiots who defend Roman Polanski. They don't stop and think it through. They don't bother to get the facts. They say it wasn't REALLY a rape-rape, or it's HIS house, or some other kneejerk answer that satisfied what they WANT to believe.
Williamson likes to get naked in his own home at precisely the time he knows school children or women are walking by. He likes to stand in front of a big window or open door in his nakedness but hey, it's HIS property, right? Let's get knee jerk and look like dumb liberals and defend the guy, okay?
The woman told police it was 8:40 a.m. when she was walking her son to school along a path between houses. She said they first spotted Williamson naked in an open door in the car port of his home. She also told police that Williamson then walked across the house to a large window, facing the way she was walking..
The above is from :
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/21/dumb-outrage-of-the-day-man-arrested-for-being-naked-in-own-home/
Note that this guy stands in front of a large window. Note that bit about the car port. THIS article is not the only one written about this guy.
Cause this guy just looooooves to opine about his property rights and he can count on fools to defend him. But here we got a judge found him GUILTY and how about all those folks who testified against him?
He loves you all, counts on you all, goes to bed smiling, knowing that all he has to do is mention property rights and the right wing nuts will defend his desire to stand in car ports nakes as school children walk by because just like the liberals of our planet, conservatives often don't use their noggin either.
Now I don't know what a car port means in this context but I do associate it with an outside type of thing. We have a garage on our house. It's connected to the house and when you are inside of the garage you are, technically, inside of our house.
But the garage has a great big ole door and hey, I could stand naked inside of my garage and be INSIDE of my house, but every school child walking by would be able to see me very plain from the street and maybe you all think this is okay because hey, it IS my house, evidently that stupid judge and all those people who testified against this guy would not agree with this.
Knee jerk is all it is. Why on earth do you serve this pervert's bidding? He uses this "my home is my castle" defense and hey, there's always idiots who will defend it.
The post about this on my True Crime Blog, from October 21 for God's sake, is below:
http://fishtruecrime.blogspot.com/2009/10/102509.html
ditto