Posted on 12/17/2009 11:02:07 AM PST by GonzoII
You two asleep at the wheel lately? Let’s go! Pingaroo...
Sounds like the couple are guilty of being properly sexually-oriented.
He should have just UPPED his fees, and charged $50,000 US Dollars....
The photographer will probably loose, just as a business cannot deny service to blacks.
Are you kidding me? A PRIVATE company cannot refuse service to whomever they want??
some enterprising folks need to find a muslim photog studio and hire them to shoot some homosexual wedding or Christian baptism or something- then file discrimination when they refuse
Sooooo they can be discriminated against because of their religion in order to keep from discriminating against someone’s taste in genital preference?
This seemingly frivolous lawsuit is deadly serious. It is intended to use the coercive power of Courts to punish those who do not follow the mainstream as prescribed by the Illuminati.
Even if the plaintiff loses, this case will still confront people with the choice of making a living by going along to get along or spending time and expense defending their own values.
There is a cultural war going on in all fronts and the family is a major target.
Wondering how the commission and the judge would view Tiger Woods’ sleeping habits... :-)
They should have simply said, "We're sorry. We have no openings available at this time. Thank you for thinking of using our service."
No lawsuit possible with respect to that response.
>> The photographer will probably loose, just as a business cannot deny service to blacks.
I think the courts would be making a mistake in asserting equivalence of race and behavior.
The photographer objected to providing service based on the the client’s behavior, not the client’s race.
Let’s follow this out to it’s logical conclusion. If I go to a bar looking to get laid, ignore a gay’s advances but get lucky and take a women home, the scorned gay can then sue me for rejecting him but accepting someone of a different gender? It’s coming, folks.
They do not want tolerance they want forced acceptance from the heavy hand of the state.
Wow.
Oh my local 7-eleven says “No shoes, no shirt no service”
I’m suing!
lol
greyfoxx39 no longer maintains the Ping list and I have not decided to do so, hoping that a person with more time will take charge of it.
what if they refused to photograph a childbirth? a conception?
this is a slap suit pure and simple.
the homosexuals are tyirng to scare forced association.
What happens if a day care center (private) does not want to endorse “heather has to momies” BS?
If this spreads then homosexuals may be forced to admit their BEHIVIOR is seen negativly.
NM list PING!
(contact me to be added or removed)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.