Could you do a series of posts on her record ( I assume in Alaska) that document the details of this ? You can label them something like ‘sarahbiggov’ or ‘sarahrino‘. That would be useful and stir a needed debate here. Not to put you on the spot LOL. Many of her fans haved pinged me with angry denials of this.
It would be useful in them to define the principles of conservatism she is violating. There are so many contrary views of conservatism here now.
It would be useful in them to define the principles of conservatism she is violating. There are so many contrary views of conservatism here now.
I have done so (on both counts) over and over again. It doesn't matter. They'll hear none of it. They close their eyes, plug their ears, and scream la,la,la,la,la,la,la,la!
It is the nature of hero worship. There will be no debate, because her positions are indefensible. There will only be more rancor.
While I don't particularly mind that, I am not here as much as I would like, and am subject to long and unexpected absences... That's why I don't post threads very often. So I don't think I'm the guy to do a truth-file on her.
But my original declaration on these threads still applies:
I will happily defend against her based upon her own record in regard to the 3 pillars of Conservatism... and I will take on all comers. So far, no one has been able to make a cogent argument in her defense... just a bunch of poo-throwing... Similar in kind to the posts in this thread against her detractors.
It would be useful in them to define the principles of conservatism she is violating. There are so many contrary views of conservatism here now.
I have done so (on both counts) over and over again. It doesn't matter. They'll hear none of it. They close their eyes, plug their ears, and scream la,la,la,la,la,la,la,la!
It is the nature of hero worship. There will be no debate, because her positions are indefensible. There will only be more rancor.
While I don't particularly mind that, I am not here as much as I would like, and am subject to long and unexpected absences... That's why I don't post threads very often. So I don't think I'm the guy to do a truth-file on her.
But my original declaration on these threads still applies:
I will happily defend against her based upon her own record in regard to the 3 pillars of Conservatism... and I will take on all comers. So far, no one has been able to make a cogent argument in her defense... just a bunch of poo-throwing... Similar in kind to the posts in this thread against her detractors.