To: Lakeshark
The word backup does not occur in that list of complaints.
59 posted on
12/26/2009 10:40:06 AM PST by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: DungeonMaster
It's implicit in the Denmark discussion. They supposedly get 18% of their energy from wind, but as the article said, they haven't closed any power plants, and have to run the old ones
all the time in order to insure even power distribution.
So why are they doing this? Ans: Cause it makes them feel better and intellectually superior typical lib reasoning.
60 posted on
12/26/2009 10:48:46 AM PST by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: DungeonMaster
It's implicit in the Denmark discussion. They supposedly get 18% of their energy from wind, but as the article said, they haven't closed any power plants, and have to run the old ones
all the time in order to insure even power distribution.
So why are they doing this? Ans: Cause it makes them feel better and intellectually superior typical lib reasoning.
61 posted on
12/26/2009 10:49:24 AM PST by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: DungeonMaster
62 posted on
12/26/2009 10:49:52 AM PST by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: DungeonMaster
“The word backup does not occur in that list of complaints.”
Sporadic power sources will not be viable until every end user has a UPS system capable of picking up the slack during direct-generation shortfalls.
That means big ass batteries.
63 posted on
12/26/2009 10:54:31 AM PST by
PLMerite
(Ride to the sound of the Guns - I'll probably need help.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson