Skip to comments.
Public gasps at Lake Michigan wind farm images
Oceana Herald Journal ^
| 12/16/09
| John Cavanagh
Posted on 12/16/2009 1:07:52 PM PST by reaganrevolutionin2010
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: Lakeshark
As many as you have, you save nothing because you have to have a power plant on back up, running all the time because of the inconsistency. This is such a dumb waste of resources. You are sadly mistaken.
41
posted on
12/24/2009 9:20:51 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: Balding_Eagle
There was a woman on Dennis Prager about 4 months ago. She has written a pro-nuclear energy book and debunks the feasibility of solar and windmill farms. She used to be an anti-nuke fanatic. He said he would post her book title on his site, but I never saw it. Can’t remember her name.
42
posted on
12/24/2009 9:50:43 AM PST
by
votemout
To: DungeonMaster
Actually, it’s those who think windpower is feasible without storage that are sadly mistaken.........cause it’s a simple matter that when the wind does not blow, people don’t turn off their electrical usage. You may want to live like a luddite, but most of us don’t.
43
posted on
12/26/2009 8:39:06 AM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Lakeshark
Soon the country will get 3 percent of it’s power from wind, then 4, then 5...
44
posted on
12/26/2009 8:51:35 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: DungeonMaster
Yes, but it won't save anything. You have to burn the fuels to back the windmills up.
So why are we doing something this stupid? Does it somehow make you feel better?
45
posted on
12/26/2009 9:29:24 AM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: reaganrevolutionin2010
They are against windmills, hydro power, coal, atomic energy, geothermal power, and probably solar panels next.
46
posted on
12/26/2009 9:33:59 AM PST
by
Hacksaw
To: reaganrevolutionin2010
This wind business is an absolute con. There are MASSIVE fields of natural gas underneath the eastern seaboard. The consters have infiltrated the Dept of energy and have bought enough congresscritters to force us to pay for their machinations.
47
posted on
12/26/2009 9:37:17 AM PST
by
mo
To: Lakeshark
Yes, but it won't save anything. You have to burn the fuels to back the windmills up. Backup is accomplished with hydro which can often be switched on and off in a heartbeat, natural gas which also can also be turned on rapidly and coal which has many levels of backup. So you're wrong.
48
posted on
12/26/2009 10:18:10 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: Lakeshark
49
posted on
12/26/2009 10:22:12 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: DungeonMaster
In a heartbeat? Bwahahahaha.
You know absolutely nothing about this stuff do you?
50
posted on
12/26/2009 10:23:58 AM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: DungeonMaster
“...pumped storage...”
-
Our public utility here in Georgia does that.
To: Lakeshark
52
posted on
12/26/2009 10:29:28 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: Lakeshark
You know absolutely nothing about this stuff do you? Heartbeat is relative to a cold coal fired plant.
53
posted on
12/26/2009 10:31:32 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: DungeonMaster
54
posted on
12/26/2009 10:35:29 AM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Repeal The 17th
I need more info. How much energy from what is stored by pumping what into what? They are experimenting with pumping air into mines here in Iowa and there are also schemes where water is pumped back into dammed reservoirs.
55
posted on
12/26/2009 10:35:33 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: Fresh Wind
I'd rather see this...Me too, but not from my patio.
To: henkster
Just like California. While I think windmills are not economical, this particular opposition to them shows what I call California Thinking. It can be summed up by the attitude of: We want electricity, but we dont want anything that actually generates electricity anywhere near us. We expect that infinite quantities of electricity will be made in some other place without any harm to any living thing and will be transported at no cost to our electric outlets.
PERFECTLY stated!
57
posted on
12/26/2009 10:39:10 AM PST
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: Lancey Howard
At least nukes are efficient, consistent and actually work.
58
posted on
12/26/2009 10:39:28 AM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Lakeshark
The word backup does not occur in that list of complaints.
59
posted on
12/26/2009 10:40:06 AM PST
by
DungeonMaster
(camel, eye of a needle; rich man, heaven)
To: DungeonMaster
It's implicit in the Denmark discussion. They supposedly get 18% of their energy from wind, but as the article said, they haven't closed any power plants, and have to run the old ones
all the time in order to insure even power distribution.
So why are they doing this? Ans: Cause it makes them feel better and intellectually superior typical lib reasoning.
60
posted on
12/26/2009 10:48:46 AM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson