Jonathan Martin & Ben Smith are homosexual lovers so take their “reporting” with a grain of salt.
Here is the real reason that she got in. Houston voters had a choice between a dangerous communist maniac or a bull dyke on steroids.
Who would you vote for? Decisions, decisions.
He wasn't very good as mayor but there was a lot of comic relief.
If I could state the choice slightly differently, I would say that Parker came across as the nerdy, but honest and fiscally conservative, policy wonk and that Locke came across as the lawyer, lobbyist tool of special interests, especially developers and big business. If there is any lesson in this for Republicans, it is that the party needs to remember the difference between supporting free markets and supporting big business. People are tired of big government, big unions and big business. The “trend” in Houston as well as elsewhere is for libertarian approaches to our problems.