>> “Sure they do good things. It doesn’t change the fact that they are a homophobic organization”
There is no such thing as “homophobia.”
People who are repelled by homosexuality are responding in the only healthy way to this disorder.
If you want to sell the false proposition that sodomy is in any way acceptable behavior, you’re knocking on the wrong door. <<
More like “homorepusive” than a phobia.
Personally I think that people of consenting age can do what they want in their own bedchambers and charitable organizations can and should be free to set whatever standards they want for themselves even if they are not “socially acceptable by one group or another” provided they are not using taxpayer monies.
“Personally I think that people of consenting age can do what they want in their own bedchambers”
1. Same-sex attraction disorder is just what the name says: a mental, emotional, and spiritual disorder.
2. It has been known for all of recorded history that many, if not all, males afflicted with SSAD are irresistibly attracted to youths.
3. When a young woman is raped, no one thinks it strange that she should suffer emotional or mental effects from the trauma. This is similar (or identical) to post-traumatic stress disorder.
4. When a young man (say, 12 through 18) is seduced or raped by a sodomite, the trauma is at least as severe as in the case of a raped woman. In an effort to deal with this trauma, some victims adopt the defense mechanism known as “identification with the aggressor,” which sometimes results in the victim developing SSAD himself. (The frequency of this could not possibly be studied in today’s upside-down world.)
5. The facts described in “4” above show that SSAD is the only known transmissible mental disorder.
6. Therefore, the more access that men with SSAD have to youths, the more men will be afflicted with SSAD. It’s a positive feedback loop: molested boys growing up to molest many, some of whom grow up to molest many more. Sometimes hundreds more. How many cases of SSAD can one rape precipitate?
7. The issue is not, nor has it ever been, “What people of consenting age do in their own bedchambers.” The issue is that the acceptance of SSAD results in more access to youths, which results in a higher incidence of SSAD, which results in more molestation of youths, which results in a higher incidence of SSAD, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
8. When “what men of consenting age do in their own bedchambers” is sodomy, it is of concern to all of us, because at some point they will be doing it to an unwilling boy who has not yet reached the age of consent.
9. Suppose the sodomy occurs as a result of seduction rather than force. How do we react when a 30-year-old man seduces a 15-year-old girl? How do we react when a 30-year-old woman (for instance, a school teacher) seduces a 16-year-old boy, who then seduces a 14-year-old girl...having been shown the ropes, so to speak?
10. In those cases, we lose our minds. We howl for blood. Yet when all the participants in such events are biologically male, we are supposed to think that no harm is done. Nay, rather, we are required to believe that young men have been “helped” to “discover” their own “sexual orientation,” and this is a good thing.
11. If you think there’s anything harmful to youth in the sort of behavior described above, then you are “homophobic.”
12. And all of that starts with agreeing to accept “What people of consenting age do in their own bedchambers,” no matter how destructive and loathsome those practices might be.