Not if her "agenda" is to include issues such as gay marriage, teaching school children that homo-sex is normal and to be accepted, promotion of homosexual lifestyles, and the range of other activist positions.
There is no need to attack her personally, but holding accountability vis a vis her viewpoints and positions re: critically important moral issues should be considered by citizens -- especially for a very important job that has a huge influence on public policy.
Being homosexual is no more an issue than being Christian or black. As long as the political office is not used to promote a race, religion or sexual preference. That is why I have a problem with the National Black Caucus.