Bon Appewtit!
Seth must be about partied out by now..
Environmental activists dressed up as CO2 molecules stage a protest in Berlin to coincide with the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. UN climate talks have shifted up a gear as ministers from 48 countries meet behind closed doors amid fresh protests a day after police arrested nearly 1,000 demonstrators in Copenhagen. (AFP/David Gannon)
Climate change demonstrators dressed as clowns hug a police officer outside the Danish Foreign Ministry during a climate march in Copenhagen. UN climate talks have shifted up a gear as ministers from 48 countries meet behind closed doors amid fresh protests a day after police arrested nearly 1,000 demonstrators in Copenhagen. (AFP/Adrian Dennis)
Climate change demonstrators gather outside The Parliament during the climate march in Copenhagen. Hundreds of demonstrators in six major Canadian cities held street marches Saturday to demand global warming solutions from world leaders attending the climate change summit in Copenhagen. (AFP/Adrian Dennis)
“...350...a number that some leading scientists...”
Interesting use of the words “some” and “leading scientists”.
Translation:
“Some: = < 25% of the climate research crowd (if it’s indeed this much)
“Leading scientist” = a physicist who cannot hold any proper job in physics save for one funded by a government grant, who hides data, and who cannot support his conclusions unless vetted by another government grant physicist.
What a utopia for green plants.
Sounds like a utopia for green plants. What they whining about?
Church of Lies and Tyranny
There you have it. The reason we haven't seen global warming so far is because the CO2 levels haven't gone high enough to trigger it yet--but they're almost there.
Nice backtracking!!!! Nice way to cover the fact that there's no proof that current CO2 levels have any effect!!!
Exactly what are they basing this number on? I want to see all the data. I want to see all the algorithms and analysis. I don't trust any of these guys at all. I didn't trust them before Climategate, and I damn-sure don't trust any of them now.
My suspicion is that 350 was picked first, then justified by some very shaky (at best) "science." Why 350? Because it is just low enough to be a significant drop, requiring significant action. (ie. transfer of money and power, and redistribution of wealth) Yet it is not quite so low as to appear unreachable, which would cause people to blow it off as impossible. In short, I think it is an arbitrary, meaningless number.
Let’s go for 500ppm!
Lush forests, and plenty of food for the vegetards!
