Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 3722535r

David didn’t repent until confronted by Nathan. Until then he was an adulterer and murderer.

I’ll grant you that last time I checked I think homosexuality was condemned more often in the Bible than murder.

But we are not in a theocracy, never have been.

It seems that it was anti-gay conservatives that made her lesbianism an issue, not her.

Maybe there was campaign subthemes that were too subtle for me to notice since I don’t live in the immediate area and had no previous knowledge of Parker. I’m sure that those who knew her knew about her private life, but it doesn’t seem like she was the one who made her private life a political issue.

I don’t have a horse in this race, no personal stake in it but it seems like some people think she ran a campaign under the raibow colors at all times and that just isn’t the case.

Some people consider shacking up unmarried to be a sin. Would this have mattered if she was hetero and shacking up?


108 posted on 12/14/2009 8:54:05 AM PST by Eagle Eye (3%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Eagle Eye

To Eagle Eye

I can only speak for myself Eagle Eye, but yes, that would have made a difference to me (if she were hetero and living together)....If President Bush and Laura had been living together and had the girls I doubt he would have been elected president or even governor for that matter.....I guess you just don’t get my point that a lack of a certain moral compass does make a difference in a society (whether you consider it a theocracy or not).....I can disagree with you respectfully........


110 posted on 12/14/2009 12:41:29 PM PST by 3722535r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson