Skip to comments.
Climate scientists didn't fake( Fraudster Borenstein fact checks)
AP via Philadelphia Inquirer ^
| December 13, 2009
| Seth Borenstein, Raphael Satter, and Malcolm Ritter
Posted on 12/13/2009 12:11:51 PM PST by gusopol3
The Associated Press studied all of the e-mails for context, with five reporters reading and rereading them - about one million words in total.
(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climate; climategate; enviromarxism; rodneykingscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: gusopol3
Sounds like the investigation Acorn conducted on itself.
In both cases I bet the final report was composed BEFORE the investigation.
How could AP do ANYTHING that is not biased?
It's in their DNA to skew/slant/spin/fake.
21
posted on
12/13/2009 1:52:17 PM PST
by
capt. norm
(Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
To: gusopol3
LOL! Yeah, I'll take the ASS PRESS's word for it!! That is why the scientists wouldn't release their raw data, eh?
To: gusopol3
23
posted on
12/13/2009 2:01:35 PM PST
by
Freep EE
To: darkwing104
Who would have guessed this to be the conclusion of the AP!!! I’m truly f***ing SHOCKED!!
24
posted on
12/13/2009 2:02:09 PM PST
by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: gusopol3
AP: What are you going to believe.. Us or your own eyes?
25
posted on
12/13/2009 2:20:28 PM PST
by
aLurker
To: gusopol3
They MSM is keen on emphasizing how the emails were “stolen.”
The “Pentagon Papers” were also “stolen” but the MSM didn’t seem to have a problem with it in that case.
To: gusopol3
I didn't mean that as a criticism.
One a.m. is not the most popular time to post an interesting thread.
And yes, the article is so absurd I am still laughing.
27
posted on
12/13/2009 3:08:41 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(Â…he's not America, he's an employee who hasn't risen to minimal expectations.)
To: gusopol3
I wonder where these folks are going to hide when the plain truth is revealed and we have to stone the perpetrators of this scam.
To: gusopol3
The emails,
by themselves, really can be spun many ways; and
by themselves do not "prove" diddlysquat, regardless of what they indicate.
OTOH, the data files and the coding files, which these jokers refuse to address, do prove plenty, and they also put the emails into an unspinnable context.
29
posted on
12/13/2009 7:35:35 PM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
To: Blue Collar Christian
and we have to stone the perpetrators of this scamYou have GOT to be kidding! These perps are ALWAYS stoned; no need for us to add to it.
OTOH, it's been a long time since I've been able to attend a good, old fashioned auto de fé...and a lot of those stoning chemicals make pretty colors when they burn.
30
posted on
12/13/2009 7:40:03 PM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
To: ApplegateRanch
Never thought of stoning someone to be the same as getting them stoned. ;^)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson