Skip to comments.
20th Century Climate Not So Hot ( Harvard Astrophysics 2003)
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ^
| March 31, 2003
| CfA Press Release
Posted on 12/13/2009 10:13:38 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Para-Ord.45
2
posted on
12/13/2009 10:17:57 AM PST
by
Tawiskaro
To: Tawiskaro
Ok, I think everyone has seen it.
3
posted on
12/13/2009 10:18:30 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(Perfection is the enemy of Good.)
To: Para-Ord.45
Don’t listen to these scientists, their Deniers of the faith.
Pray for America’s Freedom
4
posted on
12/13/2009 10:19:02 AM PST
by
bray
(Palin can see the White House from her Porch)
To: Para-Ord.45; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
5
posted on
12/13/2009 10:19:48 AM PST
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: Balding_Eagle
6
posted on
12/13/2009 10:21:10 AM PST
by
Tawiskaro
To: Para-Ord.45
7
posted on
12/13/2009 10:22:06 AM PST
by
Oratam
To: Tawiskaro
Gore demos example of “Inner Space Vaccunm”?????
8
posted on
12/13/2009 10:24:08 AM PST
by
litehaus
(A memory tooooo longt A)
To: Para-Ord.45
Clearly, these guys have not gotten the memo. Look for a retraction, soon.
9
posted on
12/13/2009 10:27:39 AM PST
by
norwaypinesavage
(GG: In science, the authority of a thousand isnÂ’t worth the humble reasoning of a single individual)
To: Balding_Eagle
"Ok, I think everyone has seen it."True, but not often enough.
10
posted on
12/13/2009 10:28:37 AM PST
by
norwaypinesavage
(GG: In science, the authority of a thousand isnÂ’t worth the humble reasoning of a single individual)
To: Para-Ord.45
11
posted on
12/13/2009 10:34:03 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: norwaypinesavage
"Clearly, these guys have not gotten the memo"
These folks are already in the target sights of the CAGW cabal. "Deniers", "fraudulent science", "crap science", etc.
12
posted on
12/13/2009 10:34:21 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: norwaypinesavage
Clearly, these guys have not gotten the memo. Look for a retraction, soon. This paper was released in 2003.
13
posted on
12/13/2009 10:34:49 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Paladin2
These folks are already in the target sights of the CAGW cabal. "Deniers", "fraudulent science", "crap science", etc. Since 2003.
14
posted on
12/13/2009 10:35:31 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Para-Ord.45; Darnright; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; livius; DollyCali; FrPR; ...
15
posted on
12/13/2009 10:49:42 AM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
To: Para-Ord.45
I haven't read the entire article, but several questions come to mind:
How did they manage to get published? The fraudsters made sure no such studies were peer-reviewed or published.
Where did the 200 "studies" come from? Those were presumably buried and "insignificant."
And most importantly, where did they get untainted data?
I undestood the the Climate RICO boys controlled it all?
16
posted on
12/13/2009 11:10:33 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(Â…he's not America, he's an employee who hasn't risen to minimal expectations.)
To: sam_paine
17
posted on
12/13/2009 11:10:34 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Balding_Eagle
First time for me. Very funny!
18
posted on
12/13/2009 11:47:25 AM PST
by
Laserman
To: Para-Ord.45
This is why the Warmists are desparately trying to change the name of the 'crisis' to Climate Change from 'Global Warming'. Do not help them along. Whenever possible, use Global Warming, with an emphasis on the word, warming. Under no circumstances use 'climate change'.
Although, to anyone with half a brain, this phrase is just as silly, since the only thing constant about this planet's climate IS change.
19
posted on
12/13/2009 11:54:36 AM PST
by
sportutegrl
(I was for Sarah Palin before being for Sarah was cool.)
To: Para-Ord.45
20
posted on
12/13/2009 4:03:13 PM PST
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
