Climate change emails row deepens as Russians admit they DID come from their Siberian server

http://www.dailymail.co.uk ^ | December 13 2009 | David Rose

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

This is a good read:

A Memo To The Global Warming Cult

[antisocial]

Bookmark

[Moonman62]

These emails need to be entered into the Congressional Record. That’s what was done with the Pentagon Papers.

[snowsislander]

Kudos to the Daily Mail for publishing this article.

[SteamShovel]

Note how the trends somewhat independently wander with separation before about 1900.....

.....and then they tighten up and almost plot over each other.

Almost as if the data fudger is spoon feeding the public with a perfectly correlating graph.

The tree ring data simply did not cooperate after the point you mention, so they cut it off.

[Reeses]

The Kremlin’s top climate change official, Alexander Bedritsky, denied the Russian government was involved in breaking into the CRU’s computer system.

Even if they did I seriously doubt CRU's computer system keeps e-mails going back 13 years. I've never seen an e-mail server keep anything close to that. Whoever did this has been intercepting and storing the e-mails for a long time. This is typically the domain of intelligence agencies. Initially they hacked a climate website to upload the files. How many scientist insiders have the time to develop this kind of hacking skill?

[Just mythoughts]

Even if they did I seriously doubt CRU's computer system keeps e-mails going back 13 years. I've never seen an e-mail server keep anything close to that. Whoever did this has been intercepting and storing the e-mails for a long time. This is typically the domain of intelligence agencies. Initially they hacked a climate website to upload the files. How many scientist insiders have the time to develop this kind of hacking skill?

This was/is an UN operation and someone on the inside would have been in charge of tracking the data, including instructional e-mails. The timing is what tells me in came from the inside. Do I know for a 'fact' no, but someone knew exactly what to dump.

[Constitutionalist Conservative]

Fine. They have oil to sell.

Not if Algore, CRU & co. get their way.

I can't see the Russians supporting a global energy scheme that threatens their only meaningful export.

[Myrddin]

I can't see the Russians supporting a global energy scheme that threatens their only meaningful export.

Bingo! They also don't have a problem telling their adversaries to piss off. On the other hand, we have a bunch of spineless wimps afraid of offending people. We have of bunch of leftist politicians owned by the environmental lobby.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Almost as if the data fudger is spoon feeding the public with a perfectly correlating graph.

Well we know they reworked the data coming out of Australia to induce warming where none existed...see this thread:

Smoking Guns Across Australia: Where’s the warming? Looking at 16 other locations.

[SteamShovel]

they reworked the data coming out of Australia to induce warming where none existed

The official line is there is no evidence of data tampering, but they never explain these "adjustments".

This is criminal given they plan to bilk the public while sending modern society back to the stone age.

[ForGod'sSake]

This is a good read:

Excellent read! Thanks for the link.