Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buyers Seem to Be Ignoring GM Bankruptcy
WardsAuto.com ^ | Dec 11, 2009 8:00 AM | By Jerry Flint

Posted on 12/11/2009 8:57:47 PM PST by Reaganez

Will consumers buy from a bankrupt auto maker? There always are bargain hunters, but I was certain many would stay away.

With Pontiac and Saturn out of the picture, I figured General Motors would be down to 16% market share, losing perhaps another 3% as worried potential buyers talked themselves out of visiting a GM showroom.

That would have left GM with as little as 13% share. At least, that’s what I figured, and I have a lot of experience covering failing auto companies.

So far, I’m wrong. GM’s market share has been climbing since it left bankruptcy, hitting 20.2% in November. In 2009’s first quarter, its average share was 18.7%.

I expected the bankruptcy to stifle sales to the point that Toyota and even Ford would catch GM during at least one month in 2009. But it hasn’t happened. GM is likely to end the year with 2 million car and truck sales in the U.S., roughly 300,000 units ahead of Toyota and 400,000 units ahead of Ford.

I also figured Toyota or Ford would outsell GM in 2010. The gap between the three top sellers was cut in half in 2009, but I might have to back off the prediction. Toyota has its own troubles with safety and recall issues right now, and Ford isn’t moving up as fast as I foresaw.

This still could change: Perhaps the full effect of Pontiac and Saturn shutdowns has yet to materialize. The Chevy Cruze small car already is late coming to market. Bad things still could happen.

But GM vehicles have been getting good reviews and publicity lately, and a lot of solid new product is coming. The Chevy Equinox and GMC Terrain cross/utility vehicles, Buick LaCrosse sedan, Cadillac CTS sportwagon and SRX luxury CUV are all-new, and we’re seeing lots of coverage of upcoming cars such as the Cruze, Chevy Camaro convertible, Buick Regal, Cadillac CTS coupe, and Chevy Volt extended-range electric vehicle.

It’s a long and impressive list.

Complete Article in Link


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: automakers; automotive; fgm; generalmotors; getaroom; honda; michigan; toyota
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: Reaganez

I know several people who have told me they would not purchase from Government Motors, and that the idea of a foreign car is no longer on the icky list.

Chevy’s new advertising campaigns are are very well made. I believe that Dimocrats are swallowing it.


2 posted on 12/11/2009 9:03:32 PM PST by RingerSIX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

I will never purchase a GM or Chrysler product period. I have owned both brands and they were terrible. Toss in the boot-licking and that seals it for me.

Put me down in the category of who cares about what they build or sell.


3 posted on 12/11/2009 9:06:27 PM PST by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RingerSIX
a foreign car is no longer on the icky list.

There's no such thing. My last five "foreign" cars have been built in the USA by American workers.

Better cars, and my money doesn't enrich the UAW.

4 posted on 12/11/2009 9:07:50 PM PST by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: wireplay
The next vehicle I purchase will be like the last one I purchased (seven years ago). A Lexus RX coming off a three or four year lease.
6 posted on 12/11/2009 9:08:41 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez
Just keep telling the lies and maybe someone will buy the trash, except of course for the government contracts. LOL
7 posted on 12/11/2009 9:12:42 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez
I agree that GM is on its’ way back. The sad truth of the matter is that it would have been better off for the company, the consumer and the tax payer if they would have gone through a traditional bankruptcy.

The Obama Administration orchestrated a massive theft on the bond holders and the American public in order to save the UAW. The way that they handled this was repugnant and changed over two hundred years of bankruptcy law by fiat and at the whim of an administration. The idea that the courts and the legislature allowed this to happen should send a shiver through every one who believes in the rule of law.

8 posted on 12/11/2009 9:15:24 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

Dear Poster,
It’s spelled hocked, not hawked.

Sincerely,
Ford Driver


9 posted on 12/11/2009 9:21:59 PM PST by papasmurf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

Who cares how many cars they’re selling- they’re probably still losing money on every one they sell.


10 posted on 12/11/2009 9:27:25 PM PST by WackySam (To argue with a man who has renounced his reason is like giving medicine to the dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

So they are going to pay us back then, right?


11 posted on 12/11/2009 9:29:38 PM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
he way that they handled this was repugnant and changed over two hundred years of bankruptcy law by fiat and at the whim of an administration. The idea that the courts and the legislature allowed this to happen should send a shiver through every one who believes in the rule of law.

You have hit the nail on the head here. This administration does not care about the rule of law at all. It regards that quaint notion as an obstacle to be circumvented in any way possible to achieve their objectives.

12 posted on 12/11/2009 9:32:35 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez
when will they build a new retro GTO? Like Ford did with the Mustang.
13 posted on 12/11/2009 9:36:17 PM PST by guitarplayer1953 (Romak 7.62X54MM, AK47 7.62X39MM, LARGO 9X23MM, HAPINESS IS A WARM GUN BANG BANG YEA YEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

Funny, I live in a big city and see several new cars and none of them are the GM brand.


14 posted on 12/11/2009 9:41:19 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

My first wife and I test drove a Buick LaCrosse two weeks ago and will probably buy one sometime next year when we can get the color we want and the new 3.2 engine proves itself. I read a story that the GM vehicles are selling well in China...


15 posted on 12/11/2009 9:41:39 PM PST by tubebender (Some minds are like concrete Thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
The sad truth of the matter is that it would have been better off for the company, the consumer and the tax payer if they would have gone through a traditional bankruptcy.

The Obama Administration orchestrated a massive theft on the bond holders and the American public in order to save the UAW. The way that they handled this was repugnant and changed over two hundred years of bankruptcy law by fiat and at the whim of an administration.


16 posted on 12/11/2009 9:42:12 PM PST by Yossarian (Free Aquabird!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

Dear GM fanboy,

I nor my family will never buy or own a GM or Chrysler product, ever. That includes if I win one via a lottery or whatsoever...I will have it loaded on a haul truck and taken to be sold as either scrap metal or sold at the nearest accommodating dealorship.

Sincerely,

Nearly anything but a GM or Chrysler car owner.


17 posted on 12/11/2009 9:44:15 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackySam
Who cares how many cars they’re selling- they’re probably still losing money on every one they sell.

Losing it by the train car load, that's why they cut the deal with china the other day, needed the money, GM will be China motors is five years if not sooner.

"HONG KONG — General Motors’ sale on Friday of a 1 percent stake in its main venture in China, coupled with a new India venture with its Chinese partner, should provide the automaker with about $400 million at a time when its overseas operations need cash to restructure and expand." Story was posted here!!

18 posted on 12/11/2009 9:44:20 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
LOL, there will soon be no more Pontiac, and there has not been a real Pontiac motor in years.
19 posted on 12/11/2009 9:46:24 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

I have seen a ton of new State Trooper Chevy’s in the past several months. How much ‘stimulus’ money went into fleet increases for state and fedgov in the past 12 months?


20 posted on 12/11/2009 9:46:38 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson