No idea what they thought they were doing but it does tend to discredit anything else they do. Besides, they're prone to say that people are anti-semitic who aren't.
So, you need a "source" ~ and if a guy peddles his own antisemitism on the net, then you have a "source" to base your judgment on.
I rarely read any antisemitic cr*p because, alas, it turns out to be cr*p.
You seem really stuck on this SPLC thing.
Yes, I agree they are scum. But there might be some people
that they list that are not nice either.
You continue to avoid the Issue of how best to evaluate people.
You criticized me for my evaluation of Louis Beam after I had read his papers.
The Best Source is the man Himself.
“So, you need a “source” ~ and if a guy peddles his own antisemitism on the net, then you have a “source” to base your judgment on.”
You make my point for me.
I believe that the best way to evaluate someone is to read their writings. Getting Info from third parties may give you an indication of what the person is about, But is Not the best evidence.
Your statement make no sense.
“I rarely read any antisemitic cr*p because, alas, it turns out to be cr*p.”
So who do you trust to prescreen all the literature you read?
How would you “know” it is antisemitic cr*p, before you have read it?