Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

That headline just destroys the whole concept of evolution. heh.

+++++++++

Yes. If there was evolution in this case, why are the chromosomes still compatible for procreation? Perhaps “evolved” was misused here.


8 posted on 12/11/2009 7:02:31 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian ( What happened to my tag line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Blue Collar Christian

I guess the author should be asked if Chinese are a different species than the Indians


11 posted on 12/11/2009 7:26:05 PM PST by GeronL (Join the Palin Putsch!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Collar Christian; GeronL
Perhaps “evolved” was misused here.

The people who write headlines are not those who write the articles. The copy editor/headline writer made a dumb mistake. It happens all the time.

14 posted on 12/11/2009 7:35:39 PM PST by Bernard Marx ("Civilizations die by suicide, not from murder" Toynbee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Collar Christian

“Perhaps ‘evolved’ was misused here.”

Obviously, they didn’t mean genetic evolution. Though there are certainly some genetic differences. It’s more like how rock ‘n’ roll “evolved” from the blues. Except, as stated, genetics has a tiny little bit to do with it.


19 posted on 12/11/2009 8:13:11 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Collar Christian
Perhaps “evolved” was misused here.

It is not used in the text of the article. I suspect the headline did not come from the author.

21 posted on 12/11/2009 8:24:33 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson