Here is an excerpt from the abstract in the original paper (underlining mine): The muscle is preserved organically, in three dimensions, and with the highest fidelity of morphological preservation yet documented from the fossil record. Preserved ultrastructural details include myofilaments, endomysium, layering within the sarcolemma, and endomysial circulatory vessels infilled with blood.
Slight differences between the fossil tissues and their counterparts in extant amphibians reflect limited degradation during fossilization.
This is a fossil with organic (carbon containing) materials, vs the normal minerals. Same situation occurs when fossils are found in coal.
Why do you and BTMS* continue to lie?
The only person who is lying is the person who is calling Brian Thomas and myself liars. You have provided ZERO proof that the organic material came from anything other than the salamander itself.
PS, you might want to get a chain saw and trim that nose of yours...it seems to be growing longer with every reply.
"
This is a fossil with organic (carbon containing) materials, vs the normal minerals. Same situation occurs when fossils are found in coal." As usual, you're a liar. There is nothing in the article to support your weird contra-factual interpretation. - Catch up with the truth, and learn to live with it.